Wednesday, May 18, 2011

#359 Pater Noster

The Lord's Prayer essentially consists of eight statements so that it looks something like this in outline:

Heaven.
Heaven.
Heaven.
Heaven.

Us.
Us.
Us.
Us.


So a version might look like this:

Our Father, make earth like heaven.

Heaven, where you are.
Heaven, where your name is hallowed.
Heaven, where your will is done.
Heaven, where your kingdom is.

Give us.
Forgive us.
Lead us.
Deliver us.

Amen.

Saturday, May 14, 2011

#358 Colossians 2:1-3

After celebrating the Colossians past (their testimony of faith), exhorting them to remain firm in the present (to the true gospel), and describing their future role (as witnesses of the mystery of Christ), he now shares his prayer for them:

"For I want you to know how great is the contest in which I am engaged for you and those in Laodicea, and all who have not seen me face to face, that their hearts may be encouraged as they are united in love, with a view to [their gaining] all the wealth of fullness of understanding -- namely, the knowledge of the mystery of God, that is, Christ, in whom all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge are concealed."

It seems pretty clear that the contest mentioned here is between Christ and human traditions and the elemental spirits of the world that are mentioned in 2:8.  This was alluded to earlier in the letter and twice later.  In what way is Paul engaging in this struggle/contest?  In 4:12, Epaphras work/struggle takes the form of prayer and this is likely part of what Paul is referring to here in 2:1.

The importance of holding firm to the faith, or perseverance, was a central theme to chapter one and it surfaces again here.  Whereas in chapter one the danger of the failure to persevere was highlighted, in chapter two the benefit of succeeding in perseverance is made known.  While failing to hold firm to the faith could jeopardize their status as a persons reconciled with and blameless before God (chapter one), a failure to continue on further in that faith by perfecting their unity in love could cause them to miss out on all the benefits (wealth) of being in Christ such as understanding, knowledge, and wisdom which are highly prized here.


While I've scoffed at the two-tier system of Pentecostal Christians who seem to believe that there are Christians and then there are baptized-in-the-holy-spirit Christians, they just might be onto something.  And that is that being saved initially is not enough.  For Paul, holding firm to that salvation once obtained isn't even enough.  We are called to advance continually toward the knowledge, wisdom, and understanding of Christ that comes with a continually increasing unity in brotherly love.

Not all Christians will stand equally before God as if God looks merely at Christ's righteousness and not at all at our own deeds.  This is the unequivocal witness of the New Testament, despite being the target of much evangelical preaching in the 20th century.  Chrysostom, in his homily to his saved parishioners on Colossians, warns them,

"For don't think that you truly and already have all things.  These are hidden also even from angels, not from you only; so that you ought to ask all things from him."

The position of the Christian is lifelong reliance on the continued mercy of God in assurance of his faithfulness to those who put their faith in him and his grace to those who have not yet done so.  And while salvation is certainly a result of the Christian life, it is more of a beginning than an end.

Monday, May 09, 2011

#357 Chipper HOF, Continued

I think the table at this link pretty much puts the case of whether Chipper is a hall-of-famer or not to rest.  The person who put the table together ranked them by “WAR” which is a statistic I don’t understand.  But more importantly, notice that Chipper is the only .300/.400/.500 guy on the entire list.  Even Teixeira, who doesn’t make the list, isn’t a 3/4/5 guy and he can’t steal a base to save his life.  When you are sandwiched in between Pete Rose and Mickey Mantle on any list, and remarkably comparable to both of them, you have a pretty good chance of getting in.  And since what voters really like are milestones, his 2,500+ hits and 1,500+ RBI will help just as much.  This also means that if they don’t put him in, they will have drastically raised the bar on who does and doesn’t get in.  And to my mind, that'd be a good thing for baseball anyway.

Friday, May 06, 2011

#356 One Hitters III

1. In a small school, everybody is a caricature.

2. Why miracles?  They made one century believe and the subsequent nineteen doubt.

3. Shouldn't the settlers of America be called the unsettlers?  They settled themselves, but unsettled America in the process.  And it has yet to settle back down again.

Tuesday, May 03, 2011

#355 The Death of a Wicked Man

For those that pledge allegiance to the flag, Sunday was a day to celebrate.  Caesar handled it as Caesar was ordained to handle it (Rom. 13:1-7).  However, for those that pledge allegiance to Jesus Christ, things are more complicated.  First four passages being cited by many:

"Do not rejoice when your enemy falls, and let not your heart be glad when he stumbles; lest the LORD see it, and be displeased, and turn away his anger from him." -- Prov. 24:17-18

"Do you think that I like to see wicked people die? says the Sovereign Lord. Of course not! I want them to turn from their wicked ways and live." -- Ezekiel 18:23

"For I take no delight in the death of anyone." -- Ezekiel 18:32

“Say to them, ‘As surely as I live, declares the Sovereign LORD, I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that they turn from their ways and live.” -- Ezekiel 33:11

Now some reaction from those whose allegiance is to Christ rather than Caesar:

Don Carson:

"That is the trouble with revenge, of course: it does not feel like a sin. It feels like justice. Many of us have become inured to the distinction because we have watched so many movies or read so many books in which revenge, especially revenge that is adamantly pursued when the proper authorities either cannot or will not pursue justice, is itself just. It matters little if the hero is Clint Eastwood in a spaghetti western or a Dirty Harry film, or Bruce Lee in a martial arts flick, or Rambo getting even in Vietnam. In every case, we enjoy a cathartic release because we are made to feel the violence is just and therefore that the revenge is justified. When the right is on your side, revenge, no matter how violent, is a pleasure. It is just‘." -- from Love in Hard Places, 2002

Jason Goroncy:

"The Church, of course, is the child of the narrative at the heart of which is reconciliation, a narrative which is ‘difficult’, to be sure, but whose Author makes it possible to ‘from now on … regard no one from a worldly point of view’ (2 Cor 5.16), to live hopefully by the word that ‘in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and entrusting the message of reconciliation to us’ (2 Cor 5.19), and to rejoice in the vocation of being ‘Christ’s ambassadors, as though God were making his appeal through us’ (2 Cor 5.20). Such is a narrative is difficult to live by because, as Ignatieff notes, it exists in relentless competition with ‘the powerful alternative morality of violence’."

 Fr. Federico Lombardi:

"Faced with the death of a man, a Christian never rejoices, but reflects on the serious responsibility of everyone before God and man, and hopes and pledges that every event is not an opportunity for a further growth of hatred, but of peace."

Michael Gorman:

"Why does the story of the terrorist-turned-apostle named Paul not give people pause in their lewd rejoicing?"

Michael Gorman:

"The common theme in Congress, in the media, and on the streets seems to be that this event has pulled the diverse and factious body of people called Americans together like nothing else in a very long time.  That should give everyone, Christian or not, at least a little ethical hiccup. How sad is it when the killing of a human being is the chief cause of human unity, even for a day or a week?
But wait–and here is the irony–for us who call ourselves Christians, the killing of a human being actually is the cause of our unity, only for us it is the being killed rather than the killing, the heroic role of victim not victor, that is the source of unity."

Sam Rocha:

"Today is a day of perverse clarity: we can see, in the words and actions of the elect, that we are ruled by thugs and war lords, that Osama and Obama observe the same creed; that the theology of violence, ritualized in the practice of physical, mental, and spiritual war, is at the heart of their politics, regardless of their polemic affiliations.  Make no mistake: Osama was a killer. The culture of Saudi Arabia from which he came (and both the secular and Islamic Middle East) is a culture of death, ruled by violent men. But make no mistake: Obama is a killer too. His liberal ways of killing are more subtle at times, but he is the commander in chief of the American military industrial complex; he presides over all US wars, those fought through martial forces and technologies and those waged through institutions that violently enslave the bodies, hearts, and minds of people at home and abroad. The culture of the United States of America is a culture of death ruled by killers... who are themselves dying..."

Michael Brendan Dougherty:

"What does a milestone mean on a road that is endless?"

Peter Leithart:

"I am glad Osama bin Laden is dead.  He was an evil man.  And I think the surgical method used to kill him is commendable.  The Bible, especially Judges, endorses assassinations: Kill the head, and the body becomes powerless .  Wars slaughter thousands, or hundreds of thousands of relatively innocent young men, always on both sides.  War is costly, especially in human terms.  Better to destroy war-mongers who start wars.  That said, my enthusiasm for this operation is tempered by the recollection that the US made Osama bin Laden... We supported bin Laden in his battle against the Soviets, as we also supported Saddam Hussein so long as he was fighting Iran.  We had a hand (how direct is a matter of dispute) in creating bin Laden, creating the Taliban, creating al-Qaeda. Americans have a right to breathe a sigh of relief.  Yet the lesson is not, as President Obama, Charles Krauthammer, and others have suggested, that 'we do big.'  The lesson is that we’re pretty good at creating messes, and that we’re occasionally good at the mopping-up process.  When the euphoria is over, will we take the opportunity to reflect seriously on our record of cultivating the serpents we later kill?"

Brad Littlejohn:

"Romans 13, in context, appears to teach that the civil authority, outside of Christ, functions as an indirect instrument which God uses to exercise retribution, but which he does not command to do so (e.g., note how Assyria is used as such a tool, but then actually punished for it), and which, when in the hands of Christians, he does not want to do so."


Jeffrey Polet:

"I want to state emphatically I am NOT saying that we shouldn’t have killed bin Laden. But the paroxysms of celebration, the orgiastic bloodlust ought to give pause to decent people. Violence, after all, and we have this on good authority, begets violence. To treat this incident as if one just won the national championship in basketball is to set aside and not advance the fundamental tenet of liberal democracy, of America at its very best: the inherent dignity of every person... Whatever else is the case, for a nation to find itself in a position where it commits tremendous financial and personal resources, and puts at risk the lives of its service men and women, not to mention its citizens, in the effort to hunt and kill one man, ought to cause for serious reflection and not drunken revelry... Girard’s positing of the connection between violence and the sacred pertains in this case to the tenets of American civil religion. Indeed, Osama’s death, like so many others in the wars before him, serves to deepen the religion of America, whose object is America. Osama is killed, and Americans take to the street chanting 'USA' and singing the national anthem. People start talking about recovering the unity we had after 9/11, never once asking why this is a desirable thing, or what ends it will serve other than to make America 'great,' and insure, as the President said, that 'America can do whatever we set our mind to'... How false and shallow must be the unity that emerges from a violent killing that takes place half a world away. How empty the lives of those who see in violence a release from the otherwise humdrum monotony of their existence.  How simpleminded a country that seems incapable of taking moments such as this as opportunities to ask hard questions of itself, of its heritage, of its ideas – questions it won’t ask because it fears the answers. How precarious the security of a people who insist on purchasing it always and only with blood."

Besides my list above, here are more reactions from followers of Christ.